|
Collaborative Work: Task Analysis Chart –
February 2012
|
||||
|
Task
|
How does it support students’
construction of their understanding?
|
Other advantages
|
Things to watch for?
|
How can I apply it in my class?
|
|
“Think-pair-share”
Teacher asks question or gives prompt;
students think in silence for a moment, sketch or write key ideas, then pair
up and share their thinking with a peer.
|
· Students share their knowledge in a
short, collaborative discussion either bridging
or schema- building depending on
the prompt
· Offers chance for self-evaluation and
metacognitive development as
students negotiate for meaning
· With proper prompt, develops academic
language (CALP) and allows practice in academic discourse (comprehensible
input and output)
· Students may help each other in L1
|
· Promotes partnership and
socio-cultural development (develops collegiality
among students)
· Lowers affective filter as ELs have a chance to practice uttering their
thoughts in English with a peer
· Students are more active than in traditional “teacher asks, one answers”
classrooms
· All
students are engaged in thinking, listening, and saying their ideas out loud
to their partners simultaneously
· Teacher can listen in on
conversations to diagnose misunderstandings and assess use of academic
language
|
· Be sure to create a safe environment
· Keep students on topic or pull class
back together in a timely manner once they’ve exhausted the prompt and moved
on to other subjects
· Give clear directions
· Make prompts purposeful: thoughtful,
provocative, and targeted to the learning (ask meaty questions)
· Be sure to give prompts regularly in
which students look for and discuss similarities
and differences
|
I could use this task to have the
students learn about the note names of the piano and music theory and its
uses.
|
|
“Describing Pictures”
Teacher collects pictures related to
the topic and glues them onto colorful background in sets of 3-5; sets are
displayed about the room; pairs of
students visit each set of pictures as in a gallery walk, talking about what
they see and describing the pictures to each other; students agree on a
question, comment, or prediction about the pictures to leave behind on a
sticky note.
|
· Students look at the pictures and
bridge to their prior knowledge
· Photos are comprehensible and not
language based’ pictures don’t require a specific language to gain
understanding
· Comprehensible input and output from
peers
· Provide opportunity for metacognitive
development when students think about what’s coming in the lesson or what
clues might be in the pictures
· Students model questioning and
describing language for each other
· Some students may know more about a
photo than others and can build schema for their partner
|
· Students are out of their seats,
walking from set of pictures to set of pictures so their blood goes to the
brain.
· Practice oral language with partners,
socialize and have a little fun
· Non-threatening environment for
sharing ideas…low affective filter
· Enhances opportunities for visual
learners
· Revisit charts to add more ideas or
questions
|
· Watch for off-task behavior and guide
them back
· Be sure everyone is participating
· Have them read high quality peers’
work as model for improving their own
|
This task would be useful in
identifying different parts of a mixing board. The students would need to verbalize and
locate different controls on the mixer.
|
|
“Compare-contrast Matrix”
Teacher prepares blank matrix to
guide student learning from text; one column may be from prior knowledge.
|
· When one column is based on prior
knowledge, student access theirs by bridging
· When columns are completed by reading
a text, the matrix organizes information and build schema
· Students negotiate with each other to
develop metacognition
|
· Bridging column provides awareness
about the subject of the coming lesson
· Students may help each other and
build social relationships
· Promotes oral language development
and skills
|
· Allot sufficient time to complete the
task
· Use high quality reading material
· Ensure all students are participating
|
Comparing a matrix between the
difference between analog and digital sound and the differences related to
color, timber, and quality of the recordings.
|
|
“Windowpane”
Teacher decides on important concepts
or steps in a process to teach through icons;
Icons are drawn on large butcher
paper as one windowpane at a time; students imitate each step of the drawing;
teacher tells the meaning and students repeat along with kinesthetic
gestures.
|
· Different avenues of approach for
each student to learn
· Icons help visual learners through
contextualization
· Period of predicting what the teacher
is drawing bridges to students’ prior knowledge
· Gestures help kinesthetic learners
· Teacher models the meaning of each
pane
· Windowpane serves as a contextualized
lecture about the topic and builds schema.
|
· ELs have an opportunity to be part of
the process and not be excluded because of language difficulties
· All students are engaged and able to
socialize as they learn
· Students learn the basics of
note-taking as teacher guides them, “Draw this. Now write that.”
|
· Make sure all students are on task
and focused
· Ask open-ended questions to develop
critical thinking
· Use 10/2 if windowpane takes more
than 15 minutes
|
I could use this to illustrate the
correct fashion in setting up a PA system including all equipment, cabling and
power chords.
|
|
“3-Step Interview”
Students are in teams of four;
teacher provides prompt for interview (answering a specific question or
telling about types of experiences, for example); two people interview each
other on the prompt (Step 1 is A interviewing B while C interviews D; Step 2
is B interviewing A while D interviews C); then Step 3 is when each person
reports out on their interviewee to the rest of the team
|
· Students share information and
knowledge in a collaborative discussion
· Students exposed to new ideas which
could aid in achema building
· Students develop oral language skills
of listening and speaking
· Students listen to their partner
speaking in the first person then they speak in the first person to their
partner
· Students report to the team and use
the third person to tell about their partner
· Students model conversational speech
for each other
|
· Everyone is speaking and listening
simultaneously, practicing comprehensible input and output
· Low affective filter in the pairs and
teams
· Promotes partnership
· Students learn about each other and
deepen their acquaintanceship
· Possibility of overcoming bias and
prejudice as students learn from each other
|
· Teacher should listen in on
conversations to asses and ensure use of academic language.
· Provide clear directions including a
chart with diagram to help students the first time
· Make sure students stay on task
· Don’t allow too much or too little
time for the interviews
|
In CCTE we have the students create a
resume and go through a formal interview process. This activity would be perfect for the
students to practice their interviewing skills and give them a feel of what
it is like to interview a prospective employee.
|
|
Envelope sort
|
·
Encourages
peer dialog and “negotiating for meaning”
·
Incorporates
scaffolding such as bridging, schema building, and metacognitive development.
|
·
Students
interact positively and have fun
·
Includes a
kinesthetic component in moving the cards around
·
Develop
social skills
·
Practice
with the sort for speed and accuracy may be a memorization tool
|
·
Everyone
participates
·
Stay on task
·
Abide by
group work norms
|
I could use this activity for
students to learn and remember the order of signal flow in setting up a
recording or live performance from microphone to mixer to speaker and all the
connections in-between.
|
|
10/2 Lecture
Ten minutes of teacher talk with 2
minutes of interaction and processing the information presented
(think-pair-share, sketch in a journal, quickwrite)
|
·
Instant
processing of information to provide feedback
·
Students can
paraphrase for each other
·
Students can
clarify in their L1
·
Helps to
validate information
·
Students
digest info in small chunks
|
·
Lowers
affective filter
·
Prevents
listening fatigue
·
Helps maintain
student focus
·
Teacher can
regularly assess comprehension
|
·
Staying on
schedule
·
Students on
task
·
Kidwatching
·
Keep it
interesting
·
Full
participation
|
|
|
Written cloze
Oral cloze
Fill in the blank on PowerPoint
or written text
|
· Keeps them engaged during a lecture,
following along to find out/predict the missing word(s)
· Multiple layers of thinking
· Better retention of lecture
· Structured to model note-taking as a
preparation for learning that skill
· Provides structure so ELs at lower
proficiency levels only need key words to complete
|
· Lowers affective filter
· Beginners can imitate peers
· Oral cloze provides safe opportunity
for oral language practice
|
· Monitor them so they don’t get lost
· Don’t make it too hard or too easy
· Choose deleted words carefully
(probably not “a” or “the”)
|
|
|
Reflection quickwrite
|
· Opportunity to reflect on the daily
learning
· Develops metacognition as they write
down their thoughts and “negotiate for meaning” within themselves
|
· Gives student the opportunity to show
what they have learned
· Student has the opportunity to write
questions about task
|
· Teacher can check for understanding
· Tells teacher areas that may need
re-teaching
· Don’t overuse so it becomes too much
of a chore
|
After a recording session I could use
this technique for students to reflect on how it went and how to improve the
session the next time around.
|
|
Inquiry chart
T-chart to be filled in as a group
where students share what they think, they know about a topic and then what
questions they have about it
|
·
Builds
schema through peer responses and discussions
·
Bridges to
prior knowledge on the left side of the chart
·
Prepares
learner for the coming unit of study
·
Metacognitive
development occurs when return to chart to answer questions on the right
side, and add new learning or revise previous ideas after interacting with
text.
|
·
Engages
students in subject matter focusing and motivating them
·
Encourages
dialog and predictions
·
Models
scientific thinking skills such as observation, and hypothesis.
|
·
Monitor
participation
·
Lower
anxiety by ensuring no right or wrong at this point – brainstorm is free
thought
·
When return
– make false statements true by revising them, versus striking or crossing
them out.
|
|
|
Whiparound
Vocabulary Strips:
Students
receive 1 question and 1 answer on a strip.
Someone starts by asking their question. Student with answer asks
question on their strip.
|
·
Be listening, focusing, and thinking to see if they have the answer
·
Use to determine prior knowledge or later as a review
·
Includes some interacting with text and is usually best at the end of
the unit
|
·
Extends understanding
·
Bridging
·
Fast-paced thinking (on your toes)
·
Working as a team, megacognitive
·
Student to student teaching
|
·
Struggling students
·
Long pauses in between (teacher should keep a copy of the entire
whiparound to help prompt the next answer)
·
Student who wasn’t there last session might be lost
·
Teacher may want to time the whiparound and post the time as a time to
beat next time (or for competition between class period).
|
With all the technical terms in music
production, this would be a fun way to learn the language of the studio.
|
|
Team Prediction
Students are asked to first predict
in writing the meaning of a story just by its title. The predictions are then
shared with teammates, choosing the NOVEL IDEAS ONLY. Each team will stand up
and read one novel idea. This is done
chorally…”We Predict that the story will be about…
|
· Students first predict the title
which uses bridging and RePresentation
· prior vocabulary knowledge very
influential
· The team work strengthens the
learning, perhaps adding Schema
Building and Meta cognitive
Development to the predictive pot
|
· Community Building and making the
learning fun
· Reinforce public speaking
· Could help peak the students
curiosity for the material
· Participation of all students
· Teacher can monitor ideas as students
discuss
|
· Disagreements
· Slackers might cause resentments with
the more active students
· If necessary, have students take
turns so each student gets to give a predictionΩ
|
|
|
Collaborative Poster with
Rubric
Teacher provides rubric outlining
criteria (excellent to unacceptable) to represent the subject (text) in a
poster form
|
·
Students
re-present the text in non-linguistic/visual, symbolic, and written form to
show what they’ve learned about the subject
·
Students
have to negotiate for meaning as they come to a consensus about what to
include on their poster
·
Students
practice using the academic vocabulary as they create their poster
|
·
Lowers the
affective filter
·
Promotes
teamwork
·
Team feels
pride of ownership
·
Express
ideas visually
|
·
All students
on task
·
Teacher
provides challenging rubric
|
I could use this activity for a stage
layout and wiring for a live stage performance. I could list all the instruments and vocals
that need to be included and have them show their wiring diagram and
microphone placement.
|
|
Gallery Walk with Docent(s)
Students display a collaborative
project. Half the class visits while the other half acts as docents to
explain their project and answer questions about it.
|
·
Reading is
summarized by the docent
·
Docent
practices oral presentation skills
·
Repetition
builds mastery of information
·
Viewers ask
questions to build schema; docent develops metacognition by answering and
explaining.
·
Text
re-presentation is furthered through process of explaining and presenting.
|
·
Group pride;
teambuilding
·
Speak t
smaller group which lowers anxiety (low affective filter)
·
Visiting
other teams’ projects enlightens students to other perspectives and
approaches.
|
·
Everyone
needs to participate as a docent
·
Stay focused
– no off-task behavior
·
Viewers
asking appropriate questions respectfully.
|
I could use this activity for
students to learn and understand the differences in microphones. Different groups could draw the fundamental
inner workings of their microphone type and the use for that microphone and
explain it to the other students during the walk.
|
|
Reciprocal Teaching
(Pairs of students read ear-to-ear,
pausing to ask and answer questions, then switch)
|
|
|
|
Perfect for the technical information
students must learn about sound waves and it’s movement through different
substances.
|
|
Word Bank with Visuals
Teacher presents key terms in advance
of the lesson with icons or visuals to enhance understanding
|
|
|
|
In music production we have a lot of
technical terms. I could use this for
just about any lesson. Great technique
for me to use with the class.
|
Doug Booth ...SDUSD/Point Loma High School/ CCTE and ROP Instructor in Music Production and Computerized Graphic Design.
Task Analysis Chart
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment